6 September 2021: Here in the U.S. of A. it's the holiday called Labor Day during which no one works - except the people who sell cars, mattresses, furniture, and stuff on special sales! The rest of us don't labor on Labor Day. The rest of the world celebrates on 1 May (originally a Communist holiday celebrating the worker). Anyway, here we are and as a follow up to a previous (recent) post we did on the autonomous surface ships the U.S. Navy is adding to the fleet, here is another offering from the WarZone about the potential capabilities of these new vessels.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The U.S. Department of
Defense has just given us our first glimpse of what will likely be a common
sight in the future—smaller ships, some of which will be unmanned or minimally
manned, sporting modular launchers capable of firing the most advanced standoff
weapons in the inventory. In this case, the launcher shown was used to fire an SM-6 missile, which is quickly becoming one of the most
relevant and flexible weapons in the Pentagon's entire arsenal. unmanned surface vessels
The DoD posted a video of the Unmanned Surface Vessel (USV) Ranger testing a containerized four-pack SM-6 launcher. Ranger is an experimental vessel that is part of the service's Ghost Fleet Overlord program aimed at defining unmanned warship capabilities and their concepts of operations.
SM-6 is capable of swatting down air-breathing threats, such as fixed-wing planes, helicopters, and cruise missiles, while also being able to intercept ballistic missiles during their terminal phase of flight. In addition, SM-6 also has a secondary strike capability, and is able to hit fixed targets on land and moving targets, such as ships, at sea with great precision over long ranges. Its high-speed and quasi-ballistic missile mode of attack makes it hard to defend against. The type is also being developed as potentially a key component of future hypersonic weapons defense architecture.
The U.S. Army is now also pursuing the SM-6, which is slated to get a big leap in performance in its next-generation form, as well. The U.S. Army will employ SM-6 on land, primarily against land targets, but it could also potentially be used as a networked interceptor to counter aerial, hypersonic, and ballistic missile threats, as well as in an anti-ship role.
With this in mind, and considering
the weapon's networking capabilities, deploying it aboard ships in a
containerized manner is a no-brainer. Working essentially as distributed weapons platforms, these ships could spread out
over great distances and launch on targets remotely with cueing from
off-platform sensors arranged throughout the battlespace, such as on major
surface combatants, fighter aircraft, airborne sensor aircraft, space
satellites, and much more. Networked weapons concepts like this—where they do
not have to rely on targeting from their launch platform—will enable the
Pentagon's Pentagon's future "kill-web" that will range over thousands, not hundreds, of miles. The launcher could have larger implications itself. It is probable, not
just possible, that it could launch other weapons that are compatible with the
Navy's Mk 41 vertical launch system (VLS), as
well as possibly others. Even if it could just also handle BGM-109 Tomahawk
cruise missiles, it would provide incredible flexibility that can be deployed
virtually anywhere. This includes on the ground. In fact, this could have
direct commonality with the launcher the Army envisions for both the SM-6 and
the Tomahawk.
In fact, the launcher seen in the Navy's video appears to be the same one, or at least a very close evolutionary cousin of, the modular four-cell launcher we have recently seen associated with the updated land-based Tomahawk. It was used to execute the first land-launched Tomahawk test since the end of the Intermediate Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Pretty awesome stuff, we would opine. And carrying this concept to the (perhaps) extreme, future wars could be fought with no human casualties! Wouldn't that be amazing!
Until next time,
Fair winds,
Old Salt
No comments:
Post a Comment